Explainable AI (XAI) for High-Stakes Decision Systems

Authors

  • Ezekiel Nyong The university of Ibadan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21590/

Keywords:

Explainable AI (XAI), High-Stakes Decision Systems, Interpretability, Transparency, Trustworthy AI, Model Explainability, Ethical AI, Accountability, Bias Mitigation, Human-AI Collaboration, Regulatory Compliance, Fairness, Robustness.

Abstract

High-stakes decision systems powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI) are increasingly deployed in domains such as healthcare, criminal justice, finance, and autonomous transportation, where errors can result in severe ethical, legal, and societal consequences. Despite the high predictive performance of complex models—particularly deep learning architectures—their opaque “black-box” nature limits trust, accountability, and regulatory compliance. Explainable AI (XAI) seeks to address this challenge by developing methods and frameworks that make AI system decisions transparent, interpretable, and understandable to human stakeholders.
This paper explores the role of XAI in high-stakes environments, emphasizing the need for transparency, fairness, robustness, and human oversight. It examines key explanation techniques, including model-intrinsic interpretability, post-hoc explanation methods (such as feature attribution and surrogate models), counterfactual reasoning, and visualization-based approaches. The discussion highlights practical applications in clinical diagnosis, credit risk assessment, judicial risk scoring, and autonomous systems, where explainability directly influences safety, user trust, and legal accountability.
Furthermore, the paper analyzes technical and ethical challenges, including the trade-off between accuracy and interpretability, explanation fidelity, bias detection, adversarial manipulation, and compliance with regulatory frameworks such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). It argues that effective XAI must be context-aware, stakeholder-centered, and aligned with domain-specific requirements.
The study concludes that Explainable AI is not merely a supplementary feature but a foundational requirement for deploying AI responsibly in high-stakes decision systems. Future research directions include standardized evaluation metrics for explanations, human-centered design methodologies, and the integration of causal reasoning into interpretable AI models.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

Similar Articles

11-20 of 187

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.