Advancing Enterprise Data Governance and Data Quality Management through Comprehensive Metadata-Centric Frameworks for Modern Data Ecosystems

Authors

  • Srinivasa Rao Seetala Senior Data Modeler, USA Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21590/ijtmh.03.03.03

Keywords:

Enterprise data governance, metadata management, metadata driven governance, data quality management, enterprise data architecture, data stewardship, data lineage management, data catalog frameworks, master data management, data lifecycle management, governance policy enforcement, enterprise data integration, information governance frameworks, data compliance management, metadata repositories, data standardization, data transparency, organizational data trust, data management frameworks, scalable data governance, enterprise data ecosystems.

Abstract

Enterprise organizations increasingly depend on large scale data ecosystems to support analytics, decision making, and regulatory compliance. However, fragmented data ownership, inconsistent metadata practices, and limited visibility into data lineage often weaken governance effectiveness and reduce trust in enterprise data assets. This study examines how metadata centric frameworks can strengthen enterprise data governance and improve data quality management across modern data environments. The research investigates governance challenges within complex data architectures and proposes a structured framework that integrates metadata management, policy enforcement, and stewardship practices to enhance organizational data control and transparency. A mixed methodological approach was adopted that combines qualitative analysis of enterprise governance practices with quantitative evaluation of governance outcomes across multiple data management scenarios. The proposed framework introduces mechanisms for metadata standardization, automated policy alignment, and traceable lineage mapping, enabling improved monitoring of data quality, ownership accountability, and compliance adherence. Findings demonstrate that metadata driven governance models significantly enhance data consistency, operational transparency, and cross domain data integration while reducing governance complexity in distributed data platforms. The study contributes a conceptual and architectural foundation that bridges academic perspectives on data governance with practical enterprise implementation strategies. The results highlight the strategic role of metadata as an enabling layer for scalable governance, sustainable data quality management, and organizational data trust. The research offers important implications for both industry practitioners and academic researchers seeking to design resilient governance models that support evolving enterprise data ecosystems.

References

[1] Khatri, V., & Brown, C. V. (2010). Designing data governance. Communications of the ACM, 53(1), 148–152. https://doi.org/10.1145/1629175.1629210

[2] Otto, B. (2011). Organizing data governance: Findings from the telecommunications industry and consequences for large service providers. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 29(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.02903

[3] Alhassan, I., Sammon, D., & Daly, M. (2016). Data governance activities: An analysis of the literature. Journal of Decision Systems, 25(sup1), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2016.1187397

[4] Lee, Y. W., Strong, D. M., Kahn, B. K., & Wang, R. Y. (2002). AIMQ: A methodology for information quality assessment. Information and Management, 40(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00043-5

[5] Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740

[6] Chen, H., Chiang, R. H. L., & Storey, V. C. (2012). Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS Quarterly, 36(4), 1165–1188. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703503

[7] Bernstein, P. A., & Haas, L. M. (2008). Information integration in the enterprise. Communications of the ACM, 51(9), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1145/1378727.1378745

[8] Cai, L., & Zhu, Y. (2015). The challenges of data quality and data quality assessment in the big data era. Data Science Journal, 14(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2015-002

[9] Zaveri, A., Rula, A., Maurino, A., Pietrobon, R., Lehmann, J., & Auer, S. (2015). Quality assessment for linked data: A survey. Semantic Web Journal, 7(1), 63–93. https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-150175

[10] Batini, C., Cappiello, C., Francalanci, C., & Maurino, A. (2009). Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvement. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(3), 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1145/1541880.1541883

[11] Gandomi, A., & Haider, M. (2015). Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.007

[12] Gosain, A. (2015). Literature review of data model quality metrics for data warehouses. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.04.176

[13] Madhava Rao Thota. (2016). Resilient Data Engineering: The Evolution of Database and Big Data Administration in Cloud-Native Platforms. European Journal of Advances in Engineering and Technology, 3(12), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17838570

[14] Hashem, I. A. T., Yaqoob, I., Anuar, N. B., Mokhtar, S., Gani, A., & Khan, S. U. (2015). The rise of big data on cloud computing: Review and open research issues. Information Systems, 47, 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2014.07.006

[15] Kambatla, K., Kollias, G., Kumar, V., & Grama, A. (2014). Trends in big data analytics. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 74(7), 2561–2573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2014.01.003

[16] Gehrke, J., Jagadish, H. V., Labrinidis, A., Papakonstantinou, Y., Patel, J., Ramakrishnan, R., & Shahabi, C. (2014). Big data and its technical challenges. Communications of the ACM, 57(7), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1145/2611567

[17] Srikanth Chakravarthy Vankayala. (2016). Reframing Enterprise Quality Engineering: The Emergence of Predictive and Cognitive Automation. Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 3(2), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17839512

[18] Assunção, M. D., Calheiros, R. N., Bianchi, S., Netto, M. A. S., & Buyya, R. (2015). Big data computing and clouds: Trends and future directions. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 79–80, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2014.08.003

Downloads

Published

2017-08-30

Similar Articles

11-20 of 213

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.